Quick summary of rendering intents used in printing

When printing, one of the biggest areas of confusion in the print options dialog box surrounds rendering intent. The rendering intent are a process of making decisions on how to deal with colors that are in and out of range of the various devices we use to display images. A bright highly saturated color that appears fine on a computer monitor might not be reproducible by your printer because the color on the screen is outside the physical capabilities of the media used to print it. Rendering intents are basic methods used to decide how to deal with these out of gamut colors.

Relative: When looking at the color gamut, relative attempts to move all out of gamut colors to the closest color that is in gamut. The drawback is that you can get banding in gradients for example as colors that are distinct on the screen blend into the same color on the paper resulting in banding. The benefit is that all colors that are in gamut are correctly and accurately produced by the printer.  This rendering intent also focuses on the luminosity values of the colors as a core element to preserve. If the brightness of the colors is important and you are willing to sacrifice a bit of saturation this is a good intent to start with. This focus on the relationship of the brightness of the hues makes it an ideal candidate for black and white.  This rendering intent also results in a loss of color as those out of gamut colors are compressed into the single closest color.

Perceptual: The rendering intent is best when working with highly saturated colors. In order to render the saturation levels it will adjust other colors to deal with the issueIt compresses and squishes the colors to fit into the output devices range. Because of this, there is a risk of a shift of colors as it moves the out of gamut colors into the printer space. This often times results in a loss of hue fidelity and luminosity. When it is a small adjustment, we might not notice but when larger we would detect the shift.

February 24, 2018

Affiliate Links

This website may use affiliate links. This means when you purchase something through links marked as affiliate links (usually noted by a *), I may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend products and services that I personally use or have tested.

New Course at KelbyOne

You May Also Like…

The power of two & working with diptychs

The power of two & working with diptychs

In this week’s podcast, we talk about how editing and selecting images for diptychs or triptychs can make for more interesting work and boost your creativity in approaching your work.

How much does that photograph cost?

How much does that photograph cost?

In this week’s podcast, I share some thoughts on pricing your work and selling your work as art for the wall. Rather than focusing on what to price, I’ll share with you some of the key things to consider when pricing your work and taking those first step

Has digital really changed photography that much?

Has digital really changed photography that much?

Normally when I get asked about film and digital, I talk about the darkroom days being less and less easy to find, changes in media, or how the industry has shifted. I might tell a story about how I used to work versus how I work today. This time I had a very quick response that could have been seen as tongue in cheek, but in the end, it seemed to be an answer that really resonated in the conversation. After all, a story is a story, and light is light.

This week’s podcast talks about my answer to this wonderful question and how I have evolved over time as a photographer to land on what I think is a great way to think about how we all deal with changes in the photographic industry.